Two chairs, one table, and who each one is wrong for
Most head-to-head comparisons end in a verdict that amounts to "they are both good, pick the one you like." That is not a comparison, it is an abstention, and it is usually what happens when the writer has not worked out what the two chairs actually do differently.
Every comparison here does three things instead. It puts the published figures side by side, so you can see which numbers genuinely differ and which are within rounding. It names the decision axis - the one property that actually separates them, which is frequently not the one the marketing emphasizes. And it states plainly who each chair is wrong for, because that is the half of the decision that saves money.
Take the Aeron against the Leap v2, the comparison most readers arrive with. The marketing difference is mesh versus upholstery. The real difference is that the Aeron comes in three shell sizes and the Leap has a lumbar pad you can position with a separate firmness dial. Neither chair has both properties, and which one your body needs settles the question in about a minute.
Where a third chair would beat both, we say so. On several of these pages the honest answer is that a Steelcase Series 1 does most of what either premium chair does for a fraction of the money, and there is no reason not to mention it.